Skip to content
academia.sh
tr
Log in

Course Advanced

The Enterprise Application Framework

Published

By the end of this course

Start course

01

Core Concepts

The trace left in the source by handing an object's lifecycle over to a container, a dependency being supplied through the constructor and its effect on testability, component scopes splitting between a default and an annotation, the precedence order of configuration sources, automatic configuration that kicks in when there is no annotation at all, and cross-cutting concerns being wrapped without touching the call site.

  1. 01 Inversion of Control An IoC container derives an object's construction, the return of the same instance, and a manually new-built instance receiving none of the annotations at all from three separate sources: of twelve behaviors, three come from a call in the source, six from an annotation alone, three from the container's own default.
  2. 02 Dependency Injection When an IoC container supplies a dependency through the constructor, it is born from an annotation; the same dependency given by hand is born from a call standing in the source — and the same class works with both. When no implementation is bound to an interface, the container throws an exception immediately, but not while the container is being built — at the first request.
  3. 03 Component Scopes and Lifecycle A managed component staying a singleton is the IoC container's default decision; being reconstructed on every call comes from an explicitly written scope annotation. An unrecognized scope name throws no error at all — the component silently stops being a singleton, and this is only visible by comparing two requests' identity with ==
  4. 04 Configuration Sources A setting value comes from one of three sources, and the precedence order is the IoC container's own rule — it never appears anywhere in the source: a value given from outside overrides a file source, and a file source overrides an embedded default. A misspelled setting name never disturbs the container at all — the program silently falls to the embedded default and reads empty instead of full.
  5. 05 Automatic Configuration If no component is declared for an interface, the IoC container puts its own default implementation in place; when the user declares their own component, the container silently steps back and never installs its own default at all. What is automatic is conditional, and that condition appears nowhere in the source with any word at all.
  6. 06 Aspect-Oriented Programming A wrap marker placed on a managed component adds behavior without ever touching the call site: a cross-cutting concern (a counter, in this example) steps in on every call, and the mechanism is a proxy. But the marker existing does not mean it is applicable — the same marker placed on a class with no interface stays ineffective without throwing any error at all.

02

The Web and Data Layer

An embedded server building its request pipeline, endpoints and routing declared through annotations, validation and the common error response produced without ever showing at the call site, data access abstracted at the interface level, the lifecycle of the binding between an object and a table and the consequences of lazy loading, transaction boundaries drawn declaratively.

  1. 01 Embedded Server and Request Processing Model The links of the request pipeline split into three sources: the object container's own default, an annotation, and an explicit call. When the same set of links is declared in a different order, the run order the container produces does not change; when a class carrying an annotation is called by hand outside the container, the annotation has no effect at all.
  2. 02 Controllers and Routing All four of the four endpoints are declared in the source with only an annotation, no call at all. When an unmatched path is requested, the object container does not raise an error, it returns a fixed default response; when two components declaring the same path are scanned, the winner depends on the scan order.
  3. 03 Validation and Error Handling Three of four fields take their validation rule from an annotation, one carries no rule at all. When the rule is broken, the common error response's envelope comes from the object container's default, while the field messages come from the annotation itself; when the same invalid object is given directly to the handler outside the container, no rule is applied at all and the defect stays silent.
  4. 04 Data Access Abstraction The same compiled set of callers — the object container, the service, and the entry point — runs against two separate implementations of a repository interface, without ever being recompiled. The caller's class file mentions only the interface; the same call runs without a hitch under one implementation while falling with an exception under the other, because the interface's promise and the implementation's behavior are separate, and the container does not close this gap, it only hides it.
  5. 05 Object and Table Binding Two of an entity object's four fields load at load time, two load on first access. A second access does not read the table again, it returns from the cache; but once the object has detached from the container, accessing a field that was never accessed before cannot reach the table, and the defect silently comes back as an empty value.
  6. 06 Transaction Management Two call paths are run side by side, and how many times the declarative transaction boundary opens is counted. A component calling itself skips the proxy: the boundary never opens for the inner call, no error comes out, and this silence is marked nowhere in the source.

03

Security, Testing and Distributed Setup

Authentication and authorization applied through a filter chain, the information a token in a stateless session carries and does not carry, which part of the container layer tests bring up, health and metrics endpoints that are never written at all, the centralization and refresh of configuration, service discovery and gateway taking over routing, resilience patterns added by annotation.

  1. 01 Authentication and Authorization Whether an authorization decision comes from an annotation, from the container's default, or from a check written directly in the source is separated by modeling a filter chain; the lesson runs the case of an endpoint carrying no rule at all and shows that whether it is open or closed is decided by a single parameter given when the container is constructed, a difference that never appears in the source.
  2. 02 Token-Based Authentication In a stateless session, everything about identity stops at the claims a token carries; there is no session record on the server side at all. Whether an authorization question is answered by an annotation or by a comparison in the source is separated by running it; the limiting measurement shows, by count, how many steps a revoked token keeps being treated as valid until it expires, because the validator never looks at any revocation list at all.
  3. 03 Layer Tests The difference between a slice test and a full context test is not an adjective but a number; the same container passing through two setups is placed side by side by counting how many components each one builds. The limiting measurement shows that even when a component's setup annotation left outside the slice never runs at all, the slice test's result never changes, and the test still passes.
  4. 04 Health and Metrics Endpoints An application comes up with endpoints that exist without ever being written — the container itself adds them; a new metrics endpoint can be added with an annotation. The limiting measurement closes in a separate narrowing section — the default endpoints the container builds do not open every piece of information at all, which field gets given out depends on an explicit mark, and if that mark is placed on the wrong field, the container gives it out too, with no error at all.
  5. 05 Distributed Configuration A central configuration value changes outside the application, but who sees it depends on the scope of the component — a singleton component carries the value at the moment it was constructed forever, a component rebuilt on every request sees the change at its next construction. The limiting measurement measures the course's quietest defect — no error occurs at all, two components that exist at the same moment answer the same key with two different values, and the difference is visible only when they are placed side by side.
  6. 06 Service Discovery and Gateway Who determined a call's target — a fixed reference in the source, a registry, or the container's own default resolution? Discovery and routing are modeled, there is no real network call. The limiting measurement measures the difference between discovery finding a target and verifying that the target still responds — a dead target never removed from the registry is found in a lookup the same way, the defect drops only at call time.
  7. 07 Resilience Patterns Circuit breaking and retry are added by an annotation; the call site never changes at all. In a manufactured failure, how many real attempts are made and at which threshold the circuit opens are measured as numbers. The limiting measurement shows that the annotation applies only to a call passing through the proxy, and a call the same class makes from within itself stays unprotected — the same boundary web-and-data-layer/06 measured, with a different outcome. This lesson closes the course and the M08 curriculum.

Final exam

The Enterprise Application Framework — Final Exam

In preparation

This course's question bank is not complete yet. The exam opens here automatically once enough questions are added.

Start typing to search.

↑↓ ↵ Esc navigate · open · close